When this New Mexico wellness clinic came to us, demand was never the problem — the system behind it was. The account was producing roughly 10 leads a month at over $100 each, with no repeatable way to bring that cost down. Twelve months later it was a structured, compliant acquisition engine generating 500+ qualified leads at a $34 average cost per lead — and as low as $25 in its strongest months.

The client

A healthcare and wellness clinic in New Mexico offering hormone- and weight-management services — Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, Sermorelin, BHRT, Shockwave Therapy, and Microneedling. The brief started as straightforward lead generation on Facebook and Instagram, but the real opportunity was bigger: an ad system that could support multiple services as the clinic grew.

The challenge: demand without a scalable system

Before we restructured the account, performance was capped by its setup, not its budget.

  • Low lead volume at a high acquisition cost — over $100 per lead
  • A campaign structure with no clear funnel organisation
  • Underused audience segmentation
  • Limited creative testing
  • Friction from Meta's healthcare advertising restrictions
  • No repeatable optimisation rhythm

What the audit found

Our Scan showed the gains would come from operational discipline, not random campaign tweaks. Four gaps stood out:

  • Compliance gap — LegitScript certification and healthcare-safe messaging were needed to reduce policy friction
  • Funnel gap — prospecting and retargeting needed clear separation and distinct jobs
  • Creative gap — messaging had to match real customer motivations, not list features
  • Optimisation gap — budget, structure, and reporting needed a consistent decision-making framework

The strategy: a funnel-based Meta Ads system

We rebuilt the account to be easier to optimise, easier to scale, and safer for healthcare advertising — around four pillars:

  • Compliance-first setup — LegitScript registration and careful wording to cut rejection risk
  • Funnel architecture — clearly separated top-, middle-, and bottom-of-funnel campaigns, each with one job
  • Audience segmentation — the most profitable audiences plus dedicated retargeting pools
  • Creative testing engine — 3–5 new creatives every week, scaling the winning angles

What we did

  • Registered the LegitScript certificate and rebuilt the campaign structure
  • Paused inefficient setups and launched new lead-generation campaigns
  • Tested multiple creative angles and tightened audience targeting
  • Established an ongoing reporting cadence tied to business outcomes

Every major change was built so it could be repeated across future services — not fixed once.

The results

The performance shift showed up clearly in the numbers.

  • Cost per lead fell roughly 75% — from about $110 in January to about $25 by May
  • Monthly lead volume grew from about 10 to a consistent 40–60
  • 500+ qualified leads over 12 months at a $34 average CPL, from $17.4K in spend and 581K+ impressions
  • In the most recent 90-day window, 116 leads at a $36 average CPL — momentum well after the initial rebuild
Bar charts: lead volume rose from 10 (Jan 2025) to 62 (May 2025); cost per lead fell from $110 to $25.
Jan → May 2025: lead volume up ~520%, cost per lead down ~75%.

Performance proof

January set the benchmark; by May the restructuring and creative testing had reshaped the account. The screenshots below are from the client's Meta Ads Manager.

Meta Ads Manager, January 2025 — around 10 leads at roughly $110 cost per lead.
January 2025 (benchmark): ~10 leads, ~$1,110 spend, ~$110 average CPL.
Meta Ads Manager, May 2025 — 62 leads at roughly $25 cost per lead.
May 2025 (after restructuring): 62 leads, ~$1,540 spend, ~$25 average CPL.
Meta Ads Manager, full year 2025 — $17,401 spent and 581,806 impressions across 20 campaigns.
Full year (Jan–Dec 2025): $17,401 spent, 581,806 impressions, 500+ leads across 20 campaigns.
Meta Ads Manager, recent 90-day window — 116 leads at about $36 cost per lead.
Recent 90-day window: 116 leads at a ~$36 average CPL — continued momentum.

The winning creative insight

The best-performing ads didn't sell features — they sold relief, convenience, and discretion. The strongest angles made the solution feel simple and accessible, and pointed to low-friction consultation booking. Two creatives alone drove 150+ and 100+ leads. Winning assets then became inputs for the next round of testing, not one-off wins.

Example Meta ad creative — simple, benefit-led messaging with a clear consultation-booking call to action.
One of the top-performing angles — simple, benefit-led, low-friction booking. (Brand logo anonymised.)

The business impact

The clinic didn't just get cheaper leads — it gained a scalable growth channel it could trust. Meta policy friction dropped, new services were launched and promoted through paid ads, and the client expanded its portfolio on the back of the system.

We booked more consultations this week than ever before — and several of those consultations converted into paying customers.

The takeaway

This was never about running “more ads.” It was about building a repeatable acquisition system — the same operating model we apply for healthcare, local services, clinics, and lead-generation businesses: audit, compliance check, campaign rebuild, creative testing, and weekly optimisation, then scale what works.

Published 15 July 2026

Want results you can verify?

Every engagement starts with measurement. See what your data is really telling you.